An Argument Against a Carolina Hurricanes Goaltender Change

TORONTO, ONTARIO - AUGUST 19: Petr Mrazek #34 of the Carolina Hurricanes speaks with James Reimer #47 during a timeout against the Boston Bruins during the third period in Game Five of the Eastern Conference First Round during the 2020 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs at Scotiabank Arena on August 19, 2020 in Toronto, Ontario. (Photo by Elsa/Getty Images)
TORONTO, ONTARIO - AUGUST 19: Petr Mrazek #34 of the Carolina Hurricanes speaks with James Reimer #47 during a timeout against the Boston Bruins during the third period in Game Five of the Eastern Conference First Round during the 2020 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs at Scotiabank Arena on August 19, 2020 in Toronto, Ontario. (Photo by Elsa/Getty Images) /
facebooktwitterreddit
Prev
2 of 3
Next

Excessive price tags on the trade market.

Of the names on the trade market, Carolina has been linked to Matt Murray of the Pittsburgh Penguins and Frederik Andersen of the Toronto Maple Leafs most often. Murray is a two-time cup winner entering RFA status with arbitration rights. While he did manage to beat out Marc-Andre Fleury for the Penguins starting role a few years back, he has already lost that title to Tristan Jarry.

Over the past two seasons (to compare with what Petr has done in his time with the Canes) Murray has appeared in 88 games. With an overall record of 49-25-1,  a .911 save percentage, and GAA of 2.77 his numbers aren’t that much of an improvement. In the playoffs, he has only a single win in seven games with a decline in his save percentage and an increase in goal against.

Although he is the youngest goalie on this list at 26, the reported asking price of a first-rounder is far too much to give up. When you consider what contract he’ll probably get from an independent arbitrator if it goes that far in extension talks, this doesn’t seem like smart asset management.

While the Canes have at least inquired about Murray, they appear to be more interested in Frederik Andersen of Toronto. A former Carolina Hurricanes’ draft pick, he has appeared in 112 games for the Leafs over the past two seasons. Going 65-29-14 he is among the wins leaders over that span.

While his GAA of 2.81 and .914 save percentage are a result of being on a poor defensive team. The Canes also give up a lot of high danger chances so it isn’t likely that his numbers would be much different should they go out and acquire him.

In the postseason he is only 5-7-0 with a GAA of 2.41 and a .928 save percentage. Although those numbers don’t exactly show the level of goaltender he is when he is on, the Leaf’s inability to get it done when it counts is a major reason they are considering moving on from him and looking elsewhere for an upgrade themselves.

The thought that they are still attempting to get Brett Pesce and/or the 13th overall pick back in this deal should make it a none starter for Carolina unless there are major adds on the Leafs’ side. Giving up a top-four guy signed to one of the best contracts in the league for a rental netminder who may or may not improve your team is a terrible decision no matter how you look at it.

Some other names that may be available via trades this offseason are Marc-Andre Fleury of the Vegas Golden Knights and Darcy Kuemper and Antti Raanta of the Arizona Coyotes. With Vegas reportedly having a deal in place with pending UFA Robin Lehner Fleury’s time in Vegas appears to be at an end.

Better suited as a 1B at this point in his career, having two more years left on his current deal at seven million per makes this bad choice. Although this could be a good time for the Canes to swap out a bad contract of their own, it seems like the Golden Knights may have to pay a team to take on the remainder of his current deal if they go their separate ways.

In Arizona, both Raanta and Kuemper could be on the block. While both have shown to be solid options in net, they certainly have a lot of risks.

Raanta can’t seem to stay healthy, only appearing in 45 games over the past two seasons. Should the Canes go out and trade for him I feel like it would be a lateral move at best with the potential to be much worst, and that is not even including the fact that they would give up an asset in the deal.

Kuemper on the other hand would be buying high. The only reason the Yotes were in the games against Avalanche was that he was standing on his head throughout the series. While he has had decent numbers throughout his career, the price may be far too hefty to acquire the 30-year-old netminder given the amount teams reportedly interested in him.